Some of you might have noticed, how some time ago I added subtle reputation counters to the game. Now I feel like it's a good time to develop them further and I gonna talk about them for a bit.
Unsurprisingly, Strive was always planned as an "actions and consequences" type of game in mind. I do not respect 'good-vs-evil' mentality in any form, so instead I try to go for 'kind-vs-mean' and sometimes even 'grey-vs-grey', although last one is pretty hard to make on reasonable level as we are already kinda involved into every story and our benefit is the main driving reason.
Anyway, reputation system in its core is very simple and initially was planned as a future countermeasure to limitless attacks and kills of strangers. I didn't quite done anything last time with it though, as punishments require actual work both writing and coding put into them. But besides just punishments, I also made reputation differ depending on your location, so for enslaving someone near Gorn, your Wimborn reputation does not suffer in a bit.
Now we are getting to actually using that system. Firstly, primal idea behind of reputation - provide player with choices and different ways to play the game. Player MUST have an option to play meanest possible way, and that also must give some benefits (some black market sort of things perhaps). But on the other side there must be consequences for either play style. Secondly, reputation should be obvious. If player decides to go nuts, it should be apparent, that game treats you accordingly and not only make some minor changes on the background.
After measuring my options and how I can achieve such thing, I think most reasonable option, not involving hundreds of optional encounters written, is to make every slave to (initially) have an affiliation with some group. Bad reputation with their native group would make them threat you worse and wise-versa. Affiliation will obviously not affect everyone, and for example, monsters won't have any real concern what others think about you. This partly will resemble and maybe even replace caste system, as I'm not quite satisfied with it yet (although, arguably, because it depends on more content worth exploring), however, it won't be permanent: slaves living with you will eventually grow less concerned about your global reputation and switch to your usual loyal servants, however, those working in public will become more affected by your reputation. This also suggests, that slave employment might see some medium rework, but that should be very easy (and worthy of work).
Of course, there still will be daily events and random encounters tied to reputation, but I don't think they are impactful enough on their own. Overall, currently I'm aiming on improving overall exploration and management aspects while also polishing existing parts (there's a lot I want to make look and feel better, next version will have new inventory and item usage system). Let me know what you think about these ideas in the comments or if you have something interesting to suggest. Next time I'll be talking about my long time enemy - endgame gold and equipment.
Sounds pretty good.
ReplyDeleteReputation is the most underdeveloped feature I've seen in games. Yet it's something that can completely drive and give purpose for a game.
After you get a solid working rep sys, the reasons and motives for events and quests will pop-up by simple logic. Even the main story line will be much easier to develop just by it.
You raid Gorn, to avoid bad rep on your city? Well, Gorn encounters start to become thougher, as people and creatures become weary. Authorities are in the look for some raider pestering their lands, and slave prices in market can raise or lower.
You have a knack for magic? Well, someone in the Mage's guild might start working against you, jealous of your exploits. Suddendly there are some really difficult slave requests, with the intention of harming your rep, or even have some unpleasant encounters.
And so and so.
Reputation, if well worked, it will broaden your options, and will make the game flow practically in itself.
*double thumbs up*
Btw, I wouldn't ditch the caste sys.
ReplyDeleteIt might lead to interesting content to have a contrast between castes and reputation.
That haughty wizard that calls you imbecile might have caste, but your rep (and power!) could grow bigger. You have a well known name being an apprentice, but he's just "another mage". Would he be jealous? Or actually change mind and take you as protegeé?
that kind of stuff.
*thumbsUp*
ReplyDelete